Thomas Penson De Quincey

Cheatsheet

Economists

Model Questions

Thomas Penson De Quincey (15 August 1785 – 8 December 1859) was an English essayist, best known for his autobiographical work Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821). While primarily celebrated as a literary figure, De Quincey also made noteworthy, albeit less widely recognized, contributions to the field of political economy, particularly as a popularizer, interpreter, and critic of David Ricardo's theories. His economic writings are characterized by his distinctive prose style, logical rigor, and attempts to clarify complex economic concepts for a broader audience.

Early Life and Education
Engagement with Political Economy
Major Economic Contributions and Ideas 3.1. The Logic of Political Economy (1844) 3.2. Exposition and Defense of Ricardian Economics 3.3. Theory of Value 3.4. Critique of Malthus
Style and Method in Economic Writing
Influence and Legacy as an Economist
List of Major Economic Works
See Also
References
External Links

Born in Manchester, Thomas De Quincey was the son of a prosperous linen merchant. He received a classical education at Bath Grammar School and Manchester Grammar School, demonstrating prodigious talent in Greek and Latin. He briefly attended Brasenose College, Oxford, but left without a degree. His early life was marked by intellectual precocity, personal struggles, and the beginning of his lifelong opium addiction, which he famously chronicled. His wide-ranging intellectual curiosity led him to study philosophy, literature, and, significantly, the emerging science of political economy.

De Quincey's interest in political economy was kindled in the early 19th century, a period when the discipline was gaining significant intellectual traction, largely due to the works of Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. De Quincey became a fervent admirer of Ricardo, whom he considered the most profound thinker in the field. He saw Ricardo's abstract, deductive method as a pinnacle of logical reasoning.

His engagement with economics was primarily through essays and articles published in periodicals like Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine and Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, as well as his more systematic work, The Logic of Political Economy. He aimed to make Ricardian economics more accessible and to defend its core principles against misunderstandings and criticisms.

De Quincey was not an originator of new economic theories in the same vein as Smith or Ricardo. Instead, his primary contributions lay in the exposition, clarification, and logical defense of existing classical economic thought, particularly Ricardianism.

This is De Quincey's most significant work on economics. In it, he sought to:

Systematize Ricardian Principles: Provide a clear, logical framework for understanding Ricardo's complex theories, particularly concerning value, rent, and profits.
Define Key Terms: Emphasize the importance of precise definitions for economic terms to avoid ambiguity and error in reasoning.
Address Misconceptions: Counter common misinterpretations of Ricardo's work by other economists and the general public.
Elaborate on Value: Provide a detailed analysis of the concept of "value," distinguishing carefully between "value-in-use" (utility) and "value-in-exchange" (market price).

De Quincey was a staunch defender of Ricardo's deductive method. He believed that political economy, like geometry, could derive universally valid conclusions from a few fundamental axioms. His early economic writings, such as the "Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy" (1824), were explicitly aimed at popularizing Ricardo's ideas, particularly his theory of value and its implications. He praised Ricardo for stripping away superficialities to reveal the underlying mechanics of the economy.

De Quincey meticulously elaborated on Ricardo's theory of value. He stressed that:

Utility as a Precondition: While utility (value-in-use) is a necessary precondition for an object to have exchange-value (i.e., no one will pay for something useless), utility itself does not determine the measure of exchange-value for most goods.
Cost of Production for Reproducible Goods: For goods that can be freely reproduced, their exchange-value is determined by their cost of production, primarily the quantity of labor required.
Scarcity for Non-Reproducible Goods: For goods with a fixed supply (e.g., rare artworks, unique wines), their value is determined by scarcity and the intensity of demand (utility plays a more direct role here). De Quincey's contribution was in the clarity and logical precision he attempted to bring to these distinctions, often using elaborate analogies and illustrations. He emphasized that the "difficulty of attainment" was the core principle underlying value.

While generally an admirer of classical economists, De Quincey offered critiques of certain aspects of Malthus's population theory. He questioned the inevitability of Malthus's pessimistic conclusions, suggesting that Malthus underestimated the potential for human ingenuity and improvements in living standards to mitigate population pressures. He also engaged with Malthus's views on gluts and effective demand.

De Quincey brought his distinctive literary style to his economic writings. This was characterized by:

Digressions: Frequent, often lengthy, digressions on related (and sometimes unrelated) topics.
Elaborate Prose: Complex sentence structures and a rich vocabulary.
Logical Rigor: A strong emphasis on deductive logic and precise definitions.
Illustrative Analogies: Use of vivid examples and analogies to explain abstract concepts.

While his style could make economic topics engaging for some, it could also be perceived as overly ornate or pedantic by others, potentially obscuring the core economic arguments. However, his intention was to elevate the discourse of political economy and to demonstrate its intellectual depth.

De Quincey's direct influence on the development of economic theory was limited compared to figures like Ricardo or John Stuart Mill. He did not found a new school of thought or introduce groundbreaking theoretical innovations. However:

He played a role in popularizing and disseminating Ricardian economics to a wider intellectual audience in Britain during the 19th century.
His emphasis on logical consistency and precise terminology in economic discourse was a valuable contribution.
Later economists and historians of economic thought (e.g., Joseph Schumpeter) acknowledged his intellectual acuity and his role as an interpreter of classical economics.
His economic writings provide insight into how literary figures engaged with and understood the burgeoning field of political economy in the 19th century.

He is generally regarded as a secondary figure in the history of economic thought, but one whose unique approach and intellectual engagement with the leading economic ideas of his time make him a noteworthy contributor to the discourse.

"Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy, Chiefly in Relation to the Principles of Mr. Ricardo" (published in The London Magazine, 1824)
"Malthus" (an article on Thomas Malthus, 1823)
"Ricardo and Adam Smith" (an article, 1842)
The Logic of Political Economy (book, 1844)
Various shorter essays and reviews touching upon economic subjects, often found within his collected works.

Classical economics
David Ricardo
Ricardian economics
History of economic thought
Confessions of an English Opium-Eater

Thomas Penson De Quincey (15 August 1785 – 8 December 1859) was an English essayist, best known for his autobiographical work Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821). While primarily celebrated as a literary figure, De Quincey also made noteworthy, albeit less widely recognized, contributions to the field of political economy, particularly as a popularizer, interpreter, and critic of David Ricardo's theories. His economic writings are characterized by his distinctive prose style, logical rigor, and attempts to clarify complex economic concepts for a broader audience.

Early Life and Education
Engagement with Political Economy
Major Economic Contributions and Ideas 3.1. The Logic of Political Economy (1844) 3.2. Exposition and Defense of Ricardian Economics 3.3. Theory of Value 3.4. Critique of Malthus
Style and Method in Economic Writing
Influence and Legacy as an Economist
List of Major Economic Works
See Also
References
External Links

Born in Manchester, Thomas De Quincey was the son of a prosperous linen merchant. He received a classical education at Bath Grammar School and Manchester Grammar School, demonstrating prodigious talent in Greek and Latin. He briefly attended Brasenose College, Oxford, but left without a degree. His early life was marked by intellectual precocity, personal struggles, and the beginning of his lifelong opium addiction, which he famously chronicled. His wide-ranging intellectual curiosity led him to study philosophy, literature, and, significantly, the emerging science of political economy.

De Quincey's interest in political economy was kindled in the early 19th century, a period when the discipline was gaining significant intellectual traction, largely due to the works of Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. De Quincey became a fervent admirer of Ricardo, whom he considered the most profound thinker in the field. He saw Ricardo's abstract, deductive method as a pinnacle of logical reasoning.

His engagement with economics was primarily through essays and articles published in periodicals like Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine and Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, as well as his more systematic work, The Logic of Political Economy. He aimed to make Ricardian economics more accessible and to defend its core principles against misunderstandings and criticisms.

De Quincey was not an originator of new economic theories in the same vein as Smith or Ricardo. Instead, his primary contributions lay in the exposition, clarification, and logical defense of existing classical economic thought, particularly Ricardianism.

This is De Quincey's most significant work on economics. In it, he sought to:

Systematize Ricardian Principles: Provide a clear, logical framework for understanding Ricardo's complex theories, particularly concerning value, rent, and profits.
Define Key Terms: Emphasize the importance of precise definitions for economic terms to avoid ambiguity and error in reasoning.
Address Misconceptions: Counter common misinterpretations of Ricardo's work by other economists and the general public.
Elaborate on Value: Provide a detailed analysis of the concept of "value," distinguishing carefully between "value-in-use" (utility) and "value-in-exchange" (market price).

De Quincey was a staunch defender of Ricardo's deductive method. He believed that political economy, like geometry, could derive universally valid conclusions from a few fundamental axioms. His early economic writings, such as the "Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy" (1824), were explicitly aimed at popularizing Ricardo's ideas, particularly his theory of value and its implications. He praised Ricardo for stripping away superficialities to reveal the underlying mechanics of the economy.

De Quincey meticulously elaborated on Ricardo's theory of value. He stressed that:

Utility as a Precondition: While utility (value-in-use) is a necessary precondition for an object to have exchange-value (i.e., no one will pay for something useless), utility itself does not determine the measure of exchange-value for most goods.
Cost of Production for Reproducible Goods: For goods that can be freely reproduced, their exchange-value is determined by their cost of production, primarily the quantity of labor required.
Scarcity for Non-Reproducible Goods: For goods with a fixed supply (e.g., rare artworks, unique wines), their value is determined by scarcity and the intensity of demand (utility plays a more direct role here). De Quincey's contribution was in the clarity and logical precision he attempted to bring to these distinctions, often using elaborate analogies and illustrations. He emphasized that the "difficulty of attainment" was the core principle underlying value.

While generally an admirer of classical economists, De Quincey offered critiques of certain aspects of Malthus's population theory. He questioned the inevitability of Malthus's pessimistic conclusions, suggesting that Malthus underestimated the potential for human ingenuity and improvements in living standards to mitigate population pressures. He also engaged with Malthus's views on gluts and effective demand.

De Quincey brought his distinctive literary style to his economic writings. This was characterized by:

Digressions: Frequent, often lengthy, digressions on related (and sometimes unrelated) topics.
Elaborate Prose: Complex sentence structures and a rich vocabulary.
Logical Rigor: A strong emphasis on deductive logic and precise definitions.
Illustrative Analogies: Use of vivid examples and analogies to explain abstract concepts.

While his style could make economic topics engaging for some, it could also be perceived as overly ornate or pedantic by others, potentially obscuring the core economic arguments. However, his intention was to elevate the discourse of political economy and to demonstrate its intellectual depth.

De Quincey's direct influence on the development of economic theory was limited compared to figures like Ricardo or John Stuart Mill. He did not found a new school of thought or introduce groundbreaking theoretical innovations. However:

He played a role in popularizing and disseminating Ricardian economics to a wider intellectual audience in Britain during the 19th century.
His emphasis on logical consistency and precise terminology in economic discourse was a valuable contribution.
Later economists and historians of economic thought (e.g., Joseph Schumpeter) acknowledged his intellectual acuity and his role as an interpreter of classical economics.
His economic writings provide insight into how literary figures engaged with and understood the burgeoning field of political economy in the 19th century.

He is generally regarded as a secondary figure in the history of economic thought, but one whose unique approach and intellectual engagement with the leading economic ideas of his time make him a noteworthy contributor to the discourse.

"Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy, Chiefly in Relation to the Principles of Mr. Ricardo" (published in The London Magazine, 1824)
"Malthus" (an article on Thomas Malthus, 1823)
"Ricardo and Adam Smith" (an article, 1842)
The Logic of Political Economy (book, 1844)
Various shorter essays and reviews touching upon economic subjects, often found within his collected works.

Classical economics
David Ricardo
Ricardian economics
History of economic thought
Confessions of an English Opium-Eater

Thomas Penson De Quincey (15 August 1785 – 8 December 1859) was an English essayist, best known for his autobiographical work Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821). While primarily celebrated as a literary figure, De Quincey also made noteworthy, albeit less widely recognized, contributions to the field of political economy, particularly as a popularizer, interpreter, and critic of David Ricardo's theories. His economic writings are characterized by his distinctive prose style, logical rigor, and attempts to clarify complex economic concepts for a broader audience.

Early Life and Education
Engagement with Political Economy
Major Economic Contributions and Ideas 3.1. The Logic of Political Economy (1844) 3.2. Exposition and Defense of Ricardian Economics 3.3. Theory of Value 3.4. Critique of Malthus
Style and Method in Economic Writing
Influence and Legacy as an Economist
List of Major Economic Works
See Also
References
External Links

Born in Manchester, Thomas De Quincey was the son of a prosperous linen merchant. He received a classical education at Bath Grammar School and Manchester Grammar School, demonstrating prodigious talent in Greek and Latin. He briefly attended Brasenose College, Oxford, but left without a degree. His early life was marked by intellectual precocity, personal struggles, and the beginning of his lifelong opium addiction, which he famously chronicled. His wide-ranging intellectual curiosity led him to study philosophy, literature, and, significantly, the emerging science of political economy.

De Quincey's interest in political economy was kindled in the early 19th century, a period when the discipline was gaining significant intellectual traction, largely due to the works of Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. De Quincey became a fervent admirer of Ricardo, whom he considered the most profound thinker in the field. He saw Ricardo's abstract, deductive method as a pinnacle of logical reasoning.

His engagement with economics was primarily through essays and articles published in periodicals like Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine and Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, as well as his more systematic work, The Logic of Political Economy. He aimed to make Ricardian economics more accessible and to defend its core principles against misunderstandings and criticisms.

De Quincey was not an originator of new economic theories in the same vein as Smith or Ricardo. Instead, his primary contributions lay in the exposition, clarification, and logical defense of existing classical economic thought, particularly Ricardianism.

This is De Quincey's most significant work on economics. In it, he sought to:

Systematize Ricardian Principles: Provide a clear, logical framework for understanding Ricardo's complex theories, particularly concerning value, rent, and profits.
Define Key Terms: Emphasize the importance of precise definitions for economic terms to avoid ambiguity and error in reasoning.
Address Misconceptions: Counter common misinterpretations of Ricardo's work by other economists and the general public.
Elaborate on Value: Provide a detailed analysis of the concept of "value," distinguishing carefully between "value-in-use" (utility) and "value-in-exchange" (market price).

De Quincey was a staunch defender of Ricardo's deductive method. He believed that political economy, like geometry, could derive universally valid conclusions from a few fundamental axioms. His early economic writings, such as the "Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy" (1824), were explicitly aimed at popularizing Ricardo's ideas, particularly his theory of value and its implications. He praised Ricardo for stripping away superficialities to reveal the underlying mechanics of the economy.

De Quincey meticulously elaborated on Ricardo's theory of value. He stressed that:

Utility as a Precondition: While utility (value-in-use) is a necessary precondition for an object to have exchange-value (i.e., no one will pay for something useless), utility itself does not determine the measure of exchange-value for most goods.
Cost of Production for Reproducible Goods: For goods that can be freely reproduced, their exchange-value is determined by their cost of production, primarily the quantity of labor required.
Scarcity for Non-Reproducible Goods: For goods with a fixed supply (e.g., rare artworks, unique wines), their value is determined by scarcity and the intensity of demand (utility plays a more direct role here). De Quincey's contribution was in the clarity and logical precision he attempted to bring to these distinctions, often using elaborate analogies and illustrations. He emphasized that the "difficulty of attainment" was the core principle underlying value.

While generally an admirer of classical economists, De Quincey offered critiques of certain aspects of Malthus's population theory. He questioned the inevitability of Malthus's pessimistic conclusions, suggesting that Malthus underestimated the potential for human ingenuity and improvements in living standards to mitigate population pressures. He also engaged with Malthus's views on gluts and effective demand.

De Quincey brought his distinctive literary style to his economic writings. This was characterized by:

Digressions: Frequent, often lengthy, digressions on related (and sometimes unrelated) topics.
Elaborate Prose: Complex sentence structures and a rich vocabulary.
Logical Rigor: A strong emphasis on deductive logic and precise definitions.
Illustrative Analogies: Use of vivid examples and analogies to explain abstract concepts.

While his style could make economic topics engaging for some, it could also be perceived as overly ornate or pedantic by others, potentially obscuring the core economic arguments. However, his intention was to elevate the discourse of political economy and to demonstrate its intellectual depth.

De Quincey's direct influence on the development of economic theory was limited compared to figures like Ricardo or John Stuart Mill. He did not found a new school of thought or introduce groundbreaking theoretical innovations. However:

He played a role in popularizing and disseminating Ricardian economics to a wider intellectual audience in Britain during the 19th century.
His emphasis on logical consistency and precise terminology in economic discourse was a valuable contribution.
Later economists and historians of economic thought (e.g., Joseph Schumpeter) acknowledged his intellectual acuity and his role as an interpreter of classical economics.
His economic writings provide insight into how literary figures engaged with and understood the burgeoning field of political economy in the 19th century.

He is generally regarded as a secondary figure in the history of economic thought, but one whose unique approach and intellectual engagement with the leading economic ideas of his time make him a noteworthy contributor to the discourse.

"Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy, Chiefly in Relation to the Principles of Mr. Ricardo" (published in The London Magazine, 1824)
"Malthus" (an article on Thomas Malthus, 1823)
"Ricardo and Adam Smith" (an article, 1842)
The Logic of Political Economy (book, 1844)
Various shorter essays and reviews touching upon economic subjects, often found within his collected works.

Classical economics
David Ricardo
Ricardian economics
History of economic thought
Confessions of an English Opium-Eater